Friday, July 27, 2007
Ipod and Lightning
Getting struck while wearing your iPod: "Doctors at Vancouver General Hospital in Canada said a 37-year-old jogger wearing an iPod was left with a Y-shaped burn on his chest, neck and face after the man and a nearby tree were struck by lightning in 2005. The lightning then jumped to the jogger." "Witnesses reported that he was thrown approximately 2.4 metres from the tree, they said. His eardrums were ruptured, his jaw fractured and he suffered first- and second-degree burns from his chest -- where the device was strapped -- up into his ear channels, along the trail of the iPod's earphones. He also had burns down his left leg and foot, where the electricity exited his body, blowing his sneaker to smithereens in the process." "While lightning usually flashes over a victim's skin, the latest issue of the New England Journal of Medicine reports that the headphones of an iPod can act as a conductor, directing a bolt of electricity straight inside the listener's ear - rupturing eardrums and leaving severe burns." So, there are times when it pays to NOT be connected to the information, communication, sight, and sound network that engulfs us all! Labels: accident, communication, information overload, iPod, jogging, lightning, safety, simplicity, technology
Tuesday, July 17, 2007
Caregiver Info You Can Use
Bottom Line Personal, a publication of Boardroom Reports, offers a most useful list: a Caregiver's "Emergency Kit" * Personal basics: Social Security number (original card or a photocopy). Keys (home, car). * Health information: Photocopy of Medicare cared. Copy of Medigap policy or policy number and agent contact information. List of current diagnoses.up-to-date list of current medications with dosage schedule. Primary care physician and specialists with phone numbers and which conditions they are treating. * Legal documents: Living will (if they want extraordinary measures taken in a medical emergency). Power of attorney for medical and/or financial decisions. * Financial information: Co-signing power for bank and brokerage accounts and safe-deposit box Savings accounts numbers Investment information Stock broker Loans information Pension, etc. Labels: accident, care, caregiver, death, emergency, health, healthcare, safety
Thursday, July 12, 2007
Bogus Information for the Masses
For at least the last three years, 3 to 4 four times a day, I've received various ridiculous "help me move my fortune from my third-world country" email letters. How can the same transparent tactics be employed more than 3,000 times unless there are legions of moron recipients who actually respond to such letters? Yet, how difficult can it be for full-facultied recipients to figure out that these bogus claims are perpetrated by career criminals in the world's cyber cafes where their thievery is largely untraceable? Did I miss an important announcement -- is the general level of intelligence dropping to new lows Labels: crime, criminal, hoax, internet, safety, scam artist, web
Thursday, May 24, 2007
Too Much Info While Driving
Foolish Highway Games Is this madness, or what? NBC Channel 10 in Phildelphia recently reported that "New Jersey legislators pushed forward a plan to make it illegal to text message while driving. The Assembly Consumer Affairs Committee voted unanimously to release the proposal after several legislators admitted frequently firing off text messages while behind the wheel, even though they know doing so is dangerous." "Assemblyman Paul Moriarty acknowledges doing it himself, but he's not proud of it. 'It's very, very dangerous,' he said. Citing that risk, the Democratic assemblyman wants to stop motorists from sending text messages while driving." "'It's more dangerous than talking on a cell phone because I believe you can keep your eyes on the road when talking on a cell phone,' Moriarty said. That's not the case when typing and sending text messages, he said. 'I only assume they're using their knees to drive,' Moriarty said." Labels: car accident, cell phone, driving, freedom, government regulation, safety, text messaging, traffic
Tuesday, April 03, 2007
Less Chatter in the Sky!
Break out the champagne. The AP reports that the Federal Communications Commission “has officially grounded the idea of allowing airline passengers to use cellular telephones while in flight. Existing rules require cellular phones to be turned off once an aircraft leaves the ground in order to avoid interfering with cellular network systems on the ground. The agency began examining the issue in December 2004.” “Federal Aviation Administration regulations also restrict the use of cellular phones and other portable electronic devices onboard aircraft to ensure against interference with the aircraft's navigation and communication systems. In an order released Tuesday, the FCC noted that there was ‘insufficient technical information’ available on whether airborne cell phone calls would jam networks on the ground.” Labels: airlines, aviation, cell phone, communication, flight, flying, safety, technology
Saturday, February 24, 2007
Surveillance: Good or Bad?
Here are five issues about surveillance posed by Eugene Volokh, Professor of Law at UCLA, and author of “The First Amendment” who observes that “surveillance is not inherently good or bad.” In any given surveillance situation, he says, one has first has to determine: * What concrete security benefits will the proposal likely provide? * Exactly how might it be abused? * Might it decrease the risk of policed abuse rather than increase it? * What control mechanisms can be set up to help diminish the risk of abuse? * What other surveillance is this proposal likely to lead to? “Such analysis suggests that traffic cameras are a good idea at least as an experiment. Cameras at public places from ATM machines to convenience stores are probably worth trying.” Each situation needs to be evaluated independently to determine whether Breathing Space is curtailed or enhanced. Labels: crime, freedom, monitoring, police, privacy, safety, security, surveillance, traffic cameras
Thursday, December 07, 2006
Info You Don't Need While Driving
Imagine losing your life because someone is moronic enough to believe he can navigate a 3000 pound, potentially lethal vehicle while diverting his attention to a device with tiny buttons… Erik Lacitis, writing in the Seattle Times, explains how BlackBerry tapping caused a car-crunching chain reaction on Iinterstate Highway 5: A 53 year-old man “fiddling with his BlackBerry, was cruising down Interstate 5's express lanes Tuesday morning in his minivan, oblivious that traffic ahead had come to a dead stop…” “His minivan smashed into a car, setting off a chain reaction that included three other cars and a Community Transit bus, which was carrying 28 passengers. “No one was seriously injured, but the accident near downtown Seattle underscores the dangers of driving while preoccupied with electronic gadgets, other passengers and even ‘driver grooming,’ according to a state study.” “The driver of the first car rear-ended by the minivan was a 36-year-old Lake Forest Park woman whose 5-month-old son was in a car seat in the back seat. The woman and her son were in satisfactory condition and staying overnight for observation at Harborview Medical Center, according to a spokeswoman.” This is sheer madness and the essence of ineffective information and communication mismanagement
Labels: auto accident, car accident, cell phones, crash, driving, safety, technology, text messaging, traffic
Tuesday, August 08, 2006
U.S Hospitals Ignore Vital Data
Study: Sleepy doctors a liability for hospitals
PROVIDENCE, Rhode Island (Reuters) -- A study cited early last year reveals that “overworked, sleepy doctors-in-training who hit the road after work are as much a hazard as drunk drivers, a finding that could unleash a wave of lawsuits against U.S. hospitals…” “According to a study in this week's New England Journal of Medicine, medical interns who worked shifts lasting 24 hours or more were twice as likely to be involved in serious crashes after work than doctors who put in fewer hours. Just as bartenders are now being held liable for accidents caused by drunk customers, hospitals, which routinely schedule interns to work double, triple or quadruple shifts, may soon find themselves sued for motor vehicle accidents caused by exhausted staff, one of the researchers said.” "The medical profession should be a leader in accident prevention, yet it's requiring its medical trainees to work marathon shifts and lets them drive home in this impaired condition in which they're unfit to drive," said Harvard Medical School's Charles Czeisler, a sleep expert. "That's akin to letting someone get behind the wheel when you know they're drunk." Despite years of research showing sleep-deprived workers are more prone to errors, the U.S. medical community has been slow to cut back on trainees' hours. The European Union has imposed a 13-hour limit on daily shifts for physicians, with some exceptions. Labels: accidents, auto accident, car accident, crash, doctors, driving, fatigue, highway safety, hospitals, malpractice, physician, safety, sleep deprivation
|